Why is it that so many Palestinians feel ambivalent about the UN recognition bid?

While there was enthusiasm in the West Bank, there were no reported demonstrations in Gaza or in the Refugee camps. And in the USA there were even some Palestinian groups who were demonstrating AGAINST the bid.

How is this possible? Why do so many Palestinians feel ambivalent about the UN recognition bid?

Geography is the key.

Palestinians have continually lost territory since 1948. Their reactions to the UN statehood bid depend to a large degree on where they now find themselves - in the West Bank, in Gaza, inside Israel, or outside the area.

The recent history of the Israeli takeover of Palestine (the last 60 years or so) has meant that the Palestinians are now divided by geography into 5 different groups. Each group lives a different reality, and faces different problems. Their reactions to the UN proposal depend largely on where they live and what their problems are. 

  

1. There are about 2.4 million Palestinians living in the West Bank. For over 44 years they have been living under a brutal Israeli military dictatorship. Military law means they have no basic human rights. They don’t have the right to vote for the government which controls them. Their land is being continuously taken over by Israeli settlers are protected by the IDF. On a daily basis, they face walls, checkpoints, curfews, military control by the IDF.

 2.There are about 1.5 million Palestinians who live inside the current State of Israel. They constitute a minority of about 20% of the Israeli population. After the creation of the state of Israel in 1948, most of them lost their lands which were taken over by the State of Israel. They live in certain cities, and do have certain rights – the right to vote is one – but they live under a highly discriminatory regime in which by law more rights are given to Jews than to non Jews. One small example. Both populations (Jewish and Palestinian) are expanding. Since 1948, Israel has created over 600 new Jewish municipalities. It has not allowed the creation of one single Palestinian community. In fact, it is almost impossible for the existing Palestinian communities to grow. So overcrowding is becoming a huge problem for them.

3. There are about 1.4 million Palestinians living in Gaza. Gaza has been described by UK Prime Minister Cameron as “an open air prison”. Their living standards are abominable, according to UN reports. Most of those people living in Gaza, are not “from Gaza”. They are themselves refugees from inside Israel who were never allowed to return. They want out. They want to produce goods and trade with the outside world, but are blockaded inside.

4. There are about 4 million Palestinians living in refugee camps in Jordan, in Lebanon, and in Syria. They were forced to leave Israel in 1948, and now they and their families have been squatting in refugee camps – many are denied citizenship in their new country but also denied the right to return to the country they were born in.

5. Finally, there are another million or two Palestinians wandering around the world in a huge Palestinian diaspora. Many fled to Kuwait, or Saudia Arabia in search of opportunity. Many of those then subsequently immigrated elsewhere – about 50,000 of them came to Canada. Some of them even brought with them the documents which show they are the legal owner of houses in Israel but which are now occupied by Jewish immigrants.

Now let’s take a look at the UN bid for statehood. How do the different Palestinian communities view it?

1. Those in the West Bank, in general, are highly supportive. We saw pictures of giant demonstrations in Ramallah when Abbas made his speech at the UN. Polls show that 83% of Palestinians in the WB support the move. Of course, for those living under Israeli occupation, the main thing is to get the Israeli soldiers – and the illegal settlers – out of the occupied territories.

Nonetheless, even there, there is some hesitation. The creation of a “State of Palestine” on only 22% of the original land of Palestine, a new state which has almost no water supplies (as Israel has captured all the aquifers), no sea port, etc. etc. seems to have rather little potential for economic development.

Ramallah is doing rather well economically today, mostly because of the huge amount of foreign aid that is coming in. Whether the new “State of Palestine’ would be able to develop economically on its own, is not clear. And if the new state of Palestine finds itself stuck in poverty, while Israel, which has taken the best land and most of the water continues to develop, how does that bode for future relations between the two?

And the current talks only envisage a ‘demilitarized” state of Palestine. How will it deal with the issues that every state has to deal with from smuggling, drug running, to external threats, etc? Is this really a state at all?

2. For those Palestinians who live inside Israel, the creation of a “State of Palestine” actually raises some worries. Although they are Israeli citizens, they suffer tremendous discrimination in a state that openly gives preference to Jews. They face discrimination in housing, in education, in employment. They also face rising “anti Arab” racism in Israel. There have recently been reports of ‘mosque burnings” in Israel – actions somewhat reminiscent of the Ku Klux Klan in the southern US.

They fear that if the State of Palestine is recognized, the world will forget them. The Palestinian citizens of Israel are also afraid that, Israel will become a “Jewish state” in which the rights of non-Jews are even more limited. Already there are some extremist Jewish groups which say that Israel should be ‘ethnically cleansed’ by kicking all of the Palestinians inside Israel over into the new state.

3. For the Palestinians living in Gaza, Abbas’ proposal is also a bit of a quandary. There were no celebrations in Gaza when Abbas spoke to the UN. Part of that was undoubtedly because Hamas opposed the move. But there are deeper issues. Gaza will still not be attached to the rest of the country. And there is little evidence that even if Palestine is recognized by the UN, Israel will let up its punishing economic blockade. The Israelis are certainly not going to facilitate trade and commerce. So what’s in it for the Gazans?

4. For the 4 million Palestinians living in refugee camps – in Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon, the proposed state – at least under Mr. Abbas’ leadership - is also highly problematic. The leaked “Palestine Papers” – if accurate – seem to show that Mr. Abbas was so keen to have a State of Palestine in the West Bank, that he was prepared to almost completely drop the “right of return” for those in the refugee camps. According to the leaked documents, Abbas’ negotiators were willing to accept a “token number of refugees – perhaps 5000 or so” and leave it at that. For those who have been living in the squalour of refugee camps for over 60 years, there are fears that Mr. Abbas is willing to “leave them out to dry” in return for becoming the head of a small Palestinian state.

5. And finally for the rest of the Palestinians in the diaspora – in  Kuwait, or Saudi Arabia, or Canada or the USA, the discomfort is palpable. In fact there were demonstrations by American Palestinians in front of the UN against the UN recognition vote. They complain that Abbas, who claims to speak for the whole of the Palestinian people, put this forward without any broad discussion on what strategy should be followed.

They also worry that this move might actually cut them off from the UN. Today, the UN accepts the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people. If the State of Palestine gets recognition at the UN, that recognition will probably limit itself to those who live in the new state. In other words, the Palestinians who are not in the new state – the refugees and the diaspora would lose their voice at the UN.

Should Canada vote in favour? Of course it should. I understand completely and sympathize with the desire of those living in the West Bank to get finally rid of the brutal Israeli occupation, and be rid of the illegal settlers who are taking over more and more of their land. The vote will further isolate Israel and the United States.

But we should also remember that even if Palestine is recognized as a member state at the UN, there are a lot of other issues of justice and human rights for Palestinians that are still unadressed.

recent op ed on UN recognition for Palestine

Who's afraid of a UN vote?

 

 

BY PETER LARSON, OTTAWA CITIZEN SEPTEMBER 19, 2011

 

5

 

In a persuasive article published in the Citizen on Sept. 1, Israeli commentator Barry Rubin warned that a United Nations vote this September recognizing the State of Palestine would likely lead to less peace and more bloodshed.

He based his argument in part on remarks he attributed to Palestinian political leader Marwan Barghouti who, he claims, called for "massive riots." Barghouti, an elected member of the Palestinian Parliament, is currently serving five life sentences for murder and terrorism.

Barghouti's alleged remarks are hard to verify since he is being held in "indefinite solitary confinement" in an Israeli jail. However, on Aug. 9, he was quoted by The Guardian, an English newspaper, calling for a "a peaceful, million-man march during the week of voting in the United Nations in September." Perhaps this is what Rubin calls a "massive riot."

While the Israeli government calls him a "terrorist," Barghouti has been described by The Economist as the best bet to replace Abbas in a Palestinian unity government. Uri Avnery, a former member of the Israeli Knesset, refers to Barghouti as "the Palestinian Nelson Mandela." Mandela was also accused of murder and terrorism by the regime and held in prison for many years.

Rubin's efforts to scare support away from the upcoming UN vote are part of a huge campaign undertaken by Israel and the United States to prevent the vote from even getting to the floor of the UN.

What is Israel so afraid of? How would a vote at the UN recognizing Palestine cause so much difficulty for Israel?

One possible clue comes from a recent fundraising letter written by Lee Rosenberg, president of AI-PAC, the dominant Israeli lobby group in Washington. In part, the letter warns AIPAC members that if the UN resolution passes, "Israelis could be dragged into foreign courts and charged with human rights violations . nations could implement sweeping economic sanctions . the Jewish presence in east Jerusalem could come under severe international challenge."

Rubin went further than predicting wanton violence - he repeated another commonly heard claim, namely that Arab and Muslim countries want to "wipe Israel off the map." The fear of a massacre of Jews resonates with Canadians who are only too aware of our own failure to protect Jews from the Holocaust. But every Palestinian leader I talked to during my visit in 2009, recognizes that no permanent solution to the Israel/Palestine issue can come about without guarantees of safety and security for everyone - including Jewish Israelis.

The issue is not whether Israelis should be able to live in "the Holy Land." The issue is how to create a political framework in which Jews and Palestinians can both live in peace and equality.

While Rubin waves the spectre of Israel being "wiped off the map," he ignores an awkward historical fact. In 1948, it was Palestine that was "wiped off the map", by the creation of the new State of Israel.

According to the Israeli daily Ha'aretz, Israel expects a massive vote in favour of the Palestinians at the UN. It reported only five countries have told Israel they would vote against the Palestinian bid: the United States, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic. (Canada has also said it will oppose it.) 130 to 140 of the 193 UN member countries are expected to endorse Palestinian membership - a majority of more than two thirds.

Israel has good reason to fear a UN vote. So does Canada. It will show how little support Israel (and Canada) has around the world.

In 60 years, Israel has become a multi-cultural society that has brought together talented people from around the world. It can be proud of remarkable accomplishments in culture, science, technology and education. It can be a light unto the world.

But if Israel wants to have safety and security for its people, and be respected among the world community of nations, it will have to find a way to live in peace with its neighbours, give up the territories illegally occupied in 1967, recognize the rights of those Palestinian refugees who have not been allowed to return home since 1948, and give those Palestinians who remain inside Israel their full civic rights.

Peter Larson is Secretary of the National Council on Canada-Arab Relations, and a member of the Canadian International Council's Middle East Study Group. The views expressed are his own.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

Read more:http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/afraid+vote/5422568/story.html#Comments#ixzz1b9L8xEkh

Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish's Perspectives on Israel Being a Jewish State

Hi Peter;
Some months ago, a small book club I belong to had the book "I Shall Not Hate" by Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish on our list. I was very moved by the book. Subsequently, the book club invited Dr. Abuelaish to come and speak about his book, and I had the pleasure to meet him. I now regard him as a friend. Notably, Dr Abuelaish's story was mentioned in Barack Obama's recent speech that mentioned 1967 borders to resolve the conflict. Here is what Dr. Abuelaish had to say about the idea of equality in a Jewish State...

(signed) a friend

I think this debate about recognition of the State of Israel as a Jewish State is nonsensical. The State of Israel is recognized internationally as a state. Whether Israel is a Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or a secular state is something for the people of Israel to decide for themselves. This should be defined by the articles outlined in a formal constitution. To date, no such constitution exists.

Just as Israel is recognized internationally, Palestinians want nothing less. We want to have a recognizable state. Palestinians have no recognizable passport. It’s a travel document. If Palestinians want to travel, they produce a humiliating piece of paper that tells any border services there is no state of Palestine. For a Palestinian to travel outside of Palestine, all countries require a visa and most of the time visas are denied. Refugees in the Diaspora are not allowed to visit their beloved ones. The children are separated from their parents and families. Anyone seeking family reunion needs to get permission from Israel to visit their beloved gets permission for a limited time - if they were granted a permit at all. Palestinians within Occupied Palestinian territories are deprived of their freedom within their own territories.

A Palestinian is not permitted to move freely within the West Bank or Gaza. That means a person cannot decide to visit a friend or relative freely, one cannot make any plans whatsoever. When mobility is disabled in this manner, it is oppressive and harmful to the psyche of a people. This collective punishment has to end.












Israel restricts Palestinians' access to their agricultural lands if they are close to a settlement and limits how much they can export. It keeps Palestinians from building or expanding their homes and demolishes those built without permission – hundreds of them each year. It refuses to grant them access to the water beneath their land, or to the electricity grid, or even permission to install solar panels; it denies them permits to build schools or medical clinics. None of these things are permitted in century-old Palestinian villages that Israel now re-defines as "closed military zones." It is injustice when Palestinians are thirsty for a drop of water and those illegal settlers enjoy it for their swimming pools.

Where is the human rights and justice and humanity we all stand for and belong to?

The Jews of Israel have the right to safety and security, just as Jews in Britain, Canada and the US enjoy safety and freedom to practice their faith. Palestinians must also feel secure in their own lands. Why should any current policy make Palestinians feel 'secure'? It's time for Palestinians to live free, safe and secure in an independent Palestinian state side by side to to an Israeli state where all people are safe and secure.

(...)

If the rights of non-Jews are dictated by the law of the land, why are Palestinians being forced out of their communities to make way for Jewish settlers? Why did the law of the land turn a blind eye to their construction, and continue to support them on the international stage? Security concerns do not justify providing Palestinians with dirt roads and squalid housing, and Jews with spacious villas and swimming pools with smooth highways. How can these kinds of policies make Palestinians feel 'equal' in any state, be it Jewish or non-Jewish?

Izzeldin Abuelaish, MD, MPH, is a Palestinian physician and infertility expert who was born and raised in the Jabalia refugee camp in the Gaza Strip. He received a scholarship to study medicine in Cairo, and then received a diploma from the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of London. He completed a residency in the same discipline at the Soroka Medical Center in Israel, followed by a subspecialty in fetal medicine in Italy and Belgium. He then undertook a masters in public health at Harvard University. Before his three daughters were killed in January 2009, Dr. Abuelaish worked as a senior researcher at the Gertner Institute at the Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv. He now lives with his family in Toronto, where he is an associate professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. See http://www.daughtersforlife.com/ for more information.

While Hamas-Fatah reconciliation takes headlines, Israel continues its slow war to take over Palestinian Land

On Friday, May 6, the Israeli military declared the area of Amniyr, a Palestinian village south of Yatta, a closed military zone and chased away the families who own the land, after demolishing structures and trees on the land the day before. 　The demolitions occurred at 5 a.m. on Thursday, May 5, when the military destroyed six shacks and uprooted 150 olive trees in Amniyr.

On Friday, the Palestinians of Amniyr had returned to the land and hung six tarps to create makeshift tents.

The Israeli army issued a "closed military zone" order on the area at 9:00 a.m. At 2:00 p.m. seven military jeeps arrived, including police and border police. The commanders showed the order and gave the people one minute to leave.

Using sound bombs and tear gas, the soldiers and police forced off the land all the Palestinians present—about thirty adults, many of them elderly, and ten children—as well as accompanying internationals. 　One woman, Fatmi Mahmoud Jaboor, passed out due to the bombs and required medical attention. The Palestinian Red Cross evacuated her to the hospital, and she was dismissed in the evening.

At 7 p.m. four military jeeps returned to Amniyr and destroyed the

tarps and what had been left standing in the area.

This is the third time in ten weeks that the military has destroyed trees, tents, dwellings and other structures on the land of Amniyr, effectively demolishing the entire village and affecting six families.

Although Amniyr is Palestinian-owned private property, Israel has declared it “state land” and prohibits the people of Amniyr from building any structures or using the land.

A local Palestinian leader has told CPT that he believes Israel is trying to confiscate the land of Amniyr because of its proximity to the Israeli settlement of Susiya.

Christian Peacemaker Teams and Operation Dove have maintained an international presence in At-Tuwani and South Hebron Hills since 2004.

Here is the link to the full report and photos from the Christian Peacemakers Team:

http://cpt.org/index.php?q=gallery&g2_itemId=22860

Daniel Barenboim and orchestra perform Mozart in Gaza

By The Associated Press 

Famed Israeli conductor Daniel Barenboim and a European orchestra performed Tuesday in the al-Madha centre in northern Gaza to show solidarity with its Palestinian residents.

Israel and Egypt imposed a blockade on Gaza in 2007 after Islamic Hamas militants seized control from the Western-backed Fatah.

Barenboim briefly entered Gaza through the Egyptian border crossing and conducted two pieces by Mozart before a small audience. International performances are rare in Gaza.

	Daniel Barenboim performs with musicians from some of Europe's top orchestras, during a concert at al-Madha centre, north of Gaza, May 3, 2011.
	Photo by: Reuters

Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza in 2007 after Islamic Hamas militants seized control from the Western-backed Fatah but eased the blockade last year.

His visit to the Gaza Strip was in violation of an Israeli law which bans its citizens from entering the coastal enclave.

Barenboim, born in Argentina, grew up in Israel. The conductor is a controversial figure in Israel, both for his promotion of 19th-century composer Richard Wagner - whose music and anti-Semitic writings influenced Adolf Hitler - and vocal opposition to Israeli policies in the Palestinian territories.

In 2008 Barenboim took Palestinian citizenship and said he believed his rare new status could serve a model for peace between the two peoples.

For more information, see a full article in "The Independent"

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/classical/news/barenboim-strikes-a-divisive-note-once-more-2278521.html

About Jews in Iran

In my "trip report" about my fascinating 2 week trip to Iran, I mentioned briefly that I had been to a Synagogue in Tehran and that I had met with an Iranian Jew. A couple of people asked me to say a bit more about that experience.

I was interested in trying to find out something about Jews in Iran because here in Canada I hear wildly different versions of what life is like for Jews in Iran.

• From the outspoken defenders of the Pro-Israel lobby, I hear that the situation of Jews in Iran is grim indeed. They suffer intensive discrimination and persecution and many of them have had to flee the country.
• From the defenders of the Iranian regime, I hear that Jews are completely integrated into Iranian life and suffer no discrimination at all. There is even a Jewish member of Parliament.

Frankly, I was a little sceptical of both claims, and I was curious to see what I could find out myself.

It took a little snooping. When I asked my (official) Iranian guide where I could find a synagogue, she told me flatly that there weren't any. I didn't believe her. I had read in the Lonely Planet that there were about 30 synagogues in Iran and that the 20,000 Jews in Iran represent the largest concentration of Jews outside Israel in the Middle East.

However, I had understood that many Jews left Iran following the Islamic revolution. Many of them had been supporters of the Shah (who has been strongly allied with Israel) and left when he had to flee the country.

Lonely Planet claims that of the 50,000 Jews who left Iran, the majority went to the USA. It also claims that in 2007 Israel offered cash incentives of $60K per family to Iranian Jews to immigrate to Israel but that few took up the offer, and that the offer was rejected outright by the "Society of Iranian Jews". (LP Iran, pp 57-58)

I then asked one of my Iranian contacts if he could help me find a synagogue. At first, he didn't understand what I meant. (I couldn't tell if that was just a translation problem). When I explained it was a "Jewish church", he offered to call a Jewish friend of his to find out. If his friend was available, he would introduce him to me.

The Jewish friend was busy, and couldn't meet us, but he told my contact where his synagogue was.  So we set off by car, but unfortunately, when we got there, it was completely closed up, behind high walls topped with an iron fence. High up, I could se some writing in Hebrew letters.


The first synagogue we went to was closed, but I knew it was a synagogue because I could see a Hebrew inscription high on the wall.


(How to interpret the fence? Lots of other buildings in the neighbourhood were also behind walls topped with fences. Its hard to know if this has anything to do with being Jewish in Iran, or whether its just being careful in an urban centre.)

We wandered around a bit, and met an old man, who identified himself as Jewish. He said the synagogue was closed. (I couldn't tell if he meant it was closed that afternoon or closed "for good".) However, he told us where there was another one.

So we got back in the car, and after about 20 minutes of more driving around Tehran we came to the address indicated. There was nothing on the outside of the building which indicated what it was. We could hear voices of young children coming from inside, and there were a number of women hanging around on the sidewalk. After a while, they were joined by kids and headed off. The women were all wearing head scarves or hijab, and it didn't occur to me that they might be Jewish.

Eventually, we found a custodian who let us in. It turns out that this was a rather large (and well appointed) Synagogue, attached to a Jewish School. We walked around the Synagogue which was deserted. We were told there was some kind of big ceremony to take place that night. I thought it might be a good place to meet people, but our hotel was quite a way away and it wasn't clear if we would be welcome in any event. So I didn't come back.


The second synagogue was empty but the custodian let us in to take a few pictures. it seemed well appointed. I counted seats for about 200 people



The "altar" seemed ready for use. The custodian told us that preparations were being made for a big celebration that evening. (I later understood that is was Passover).

However, my same friend, ever helpful made contact with a representative of the Jewish community in Tehran, who offered to meet us the next day.

So I got to meet Farhad Aframian, Head of the Cultural Committee and member of the Board of directors of the Tehran Jewish Committee. Mr. Aframian, about 35 or so, identified himself as a lawyer, practicing in Tehran, who is also on a voluntary basis editor of the Committee's news magazine, of which he gave me a few copies in English and Farsi.

(For more info you can go to his website: http://www.iranjewish.com/English.htm)



Farhad Aframian was relaxed and happy to chat, but unfortunately we were very constrained by time as traffic had held him up, and I had to leave for another meeting after less than a half an hour.

 In our short conversation, I wanted to get clarity on two issues.

First - whether he felt there was any significant discrimination against Jews in todays Iran - in housing, education or employment for example. His answer was that while there is some discrimination - it is not severe, it is discouraged by the government, and in any event it isn't any worse than that suffered by other non muslims in iran (e.g. Zoroastrians, or Armenian Christians). He told me for example that there are 4 Jewish schools in Tehran - 2 for boys and 2 for girls, including the one I had seen at the synagogue the day before.

Second - whether his association was supported by the government of Iran. He said that all their funds come from within the community.

What to make of all this? I don't know. I can't really draw conclusions based on such little information. But my guess is that life for Jews in Iran is neither as dire as the Israel lobby makes it out to be, nor as rhapsodic as the Iranian government might think. It certainly deserves a bit more investigation.

For interest here is an article I found on the net by a Jew who has lived in the US, Iran and Israel.
 http://www.jewishmag.com/118mag/jews-iran/jews-iran.htm

The Jerusalem bomb - a terrible setback for the Palestinian cause

The recent bomb in Jerusalem - after 7 years of relative peace in that city - is a terrible event. First of all, for the innocent civilians involved. No decent human being can support the use of violence against civilians.

Of course the Israelis, too, attack civilians. Over 400 Palestinian children were killed in the attack on Gaza. And they should be (and were) widely condemned for it.


According to news reports, the bus bombing killed one person and left up to 50 injured



But that is not a justification for anybody else to do the same thing. It is easy to understand the frustration that could have led to this. But it is not morally justified - and equally important - it is a tactical disaster.

Murdering Israeli civilians is a huge setback for the Palestinian cause. Not just because it will drive Israelis even further into the militant camp, (though not many are in a peace camp today), but more importantly, because it will  undercut the sympathy for Palestinians in the West.

The Israel lobby work hard to convince Canadians that Israel is under threat and justifies everything it does to protect its security. If it didn't blocade Gaza, build the wall, imprison Palestinians, etc. etc., Israel says in effect, the Arabs would kill us all. This bomb seems to confirm that message.

No decent Canadian, however sympathetic to the cause of human rights for Palestinians, can approve of this terrorist attack. Many will today be shaken in their belief that Palestinians just want human rights. ("Perhaps they do want revenge", they will wonder. "And if they want "revenge" I don't want any part of it.")

We still don't know who did it. (Hamas is blamed - of course - but who knows??) It doesn't even matter. In fact, the bomb might as well have been placed by Israeli secret agents - judging by the effect it will have. This act will make it much harder to develop support for Palestinians in Canada.

Palestinian Canadians, those who want to develop support for their cause in Canada, must be very disappointed.

Background

Of course, the Jerusalem bombing has a context. It comes after days of mounting tension between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel has attacked Gaza several times from the air, killing many Palestinians including children. Hamas has been lobbing more of its ineffective rockets in to Israel.

And then there was that terrible murder near Nablus of 5 Jewish settlers. Of course, the settlers shouldn't have been there in the first place. Of course, it is not clear who murdered them. (Suspicion has fallen on an immigrant worker who was not Palestinian.)

But that has not stopped the Israeli government from telling the whole world that the act was done by Palestinian terrorists. Nor has it stopped Israeli settlers from what they call a "day of Rage" attacking Palestinians all over the West Bank "in retaliation".

On Monday a Palestinian was stabbed by settlers, a shop was set on fire and later a group of settlers were seen stoning Palestinians' cars in Hebron in the southern West Bank. One of the Hebron settlers also ran over a five-year-old Palestinian boy causing moderate injuries while on Sunday an 11-year-old Palestinian girl walking to school was run over. 

Jewish settlers armed with machine guns and accompanied by Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) soldiers uprooted hundreds of olive trees planted by Palestinian farmers near Bethlehem.

Israel will take full advantage of this opportunity to paint Palestinians in an unfavourable light, and Palestine's western supporters will be nervously holding back, trying to make sense of it.

For more information on the "Day of Rage" and its impact on Palestinians, read here.

http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=54954

Palestinians deserve their human rights. We can develop a broad Canadian base of support for this. But those efforts are seriously undermined when it appears that Palestinians have attacked innocent Israeli citizens.

Is it true that Palestinians "danced in the streets" of Gaza over the murder of the 5 settlers?

A Brand New Myth

In the wake of the horrific murders of five Jewish family members, including three children, in the West Bank settlement of Itamar, a number of conservative blogs have been pushing a story that crowds of Palestinians in Gaza turned out to “celebrate” the murders. The stories were accompanied by photos apparently from Getty Photos.

A Palestinian man is shown offering sweets to Hamas policemen in the streets of the Gaza town of Rafah to celebrate an attack which killed five members of an Israeli family in Itamar

 A Palestinian man distributing sweets in the streets of the southern Gaza Strip town of Rafah on March 12, 2011 to celebrate an attack which killed five Israeli settlers at the Itamar settlement near the West Bank city of Nablus

Ynet news reported, “Gaza residents from the southern city of Rafah hit the streets Saturday to celebrate the terror attack in the West Bank settlement of Itamar where five family members were murdered in their sleep, including three children. Residents handed out candy and sweets, one resident saying the joy ‘is a natural response to the harm settlers inflict on the Palestinian residents in the West Bank.’”

The story was subsequently picked up by the Israeli press which reported jubilant Muslims crowded Gaza’s streets, handing out candy and sweets in the wake of the murders.Later, it came to North America and has been widely circulated by Zionist circles as a way to prove the basic, inhuman nature of Palestinians.

However, all of these claims appear to be based on a single story from last Saturday in the Israeli tabloid Ynet. http://www.ynetnews.com An internet search shows several pictures of the same man offering sweets to various people. He also seems to have a camera in his other hand. No “jubilant Muslims” are to seen in the background of the pictures. In fact, it looks like a normal day in Rafah.

All this appears to be an elaborate propaganda piece aimed – again – at portraying Palestinians as hate-crazed and Anti-Semitic. In fact, almost all organizations in Palestinian society have denounced the murders and called for an impartial investigation of what happened.

Murder in the West Bank

Last Friday, somebody brutally murdered 5 Israelis in the West Bank settlement of Itamar, near Nablus. Apparently the murderer entered the fenced and guarded compound in the middle of the night, and murdered 5 settlers, including the father and mother and 3 children in their beds.

Five victims - two adults and 3 children

An atrocious act which no circumstance could ever justify.

But who did it? And why?

Immediately suspicion fell on Palestinians. They certainly would have motive. Israeli settlers are illegally occupying Palestinian land, cutting down Palestinian trees, killing Palestinian animals, throwing stones at Palestinian kids. They are protected by the Israeli army. Some Palestinians can't take it any more. That is the objective: to discourage the Palestinians. The settlers believe that God gave them the land of Israel, and they have the God-given right to try to chase the Palestinians away.

(For a concrete example of this daily harassment, see a letter from The Christian Peacekeepers Team in Hebron, which I have reprinted below. Their letters, every week, detail the vicious war that the Israeli "settlers" are waging against the Palestinians in the area.)

But did Palestinians commit the murder? And if so who? A frustrated shepherd? A terrorist cell?

The Israeli Press and the Israeli Government were quick to implicate Palestinian "terrorists". Some attributed the murder to "The Al-Aqsa Brigade" even though they disclaimed any responsibility. (It's hard to image that any political organization would expect to gain sympathy by killing babies). Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas condemned the killing and Hamas also dissociated it self from it.

The Israeli government quickly announced that it would build 500 more settlements in the West Bank in reprisal for the murder. (The announcement was so quick it seems likely they were already planning to do so but that the murder provided a convenient justification that would be hard for the international community to criticise.)

Israel Approves New Construction in Wake of Massacre

In response to this bloody incident the Israeli cabinet approved the construction of several hundred new homes in several different localities in the disputed West Bank, including in Gush Etzion, Maale Adumim, Ariel and Kiryat Sefer. The Associated Press reported that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office sent a text message to journalists stating that all the new construction has been approved in areas which are considered to be major settlement blocs that Israel intends to keep after a final peace settlement has been reached.

Mideast Newswire 

But do we know who did it? The police investigation is still under way

Now it appears that there is another possible explanation. Apparently the murdered family had one (or more) immigrant Thai workers in their employ. Israel has increasingly resorted to using immigrant workers to do menial and agricultural jobs. One of these workers seems to have had some issues with the family, including the fact that he was owed a significant amount of back wages. According to the Jerusalem Post, he has also been arrested, although police have now put a "gag" order on the press.

I do not know how this will turn out. However, the political temptation to blame the murders on "Palestinian terrorists" seems all too powerful. It has begun to circulate as a 'fact" in the Western Jewish diaspora. And I do not have confidence that the Israeli police investigation will be able to resist the political pressures to put further blame on Palestinian "terrorists".

Here is the most recent post from the Christian Peacemakers Team in Hebron. It gives you an idea of the kind of constant tension that the Palestinians are living under in the West Bank. The CPT is a Christian group dedicated to peace and justice in the Middle East.
You can get on their mailing list by writing to: cpthebron@yahoogroups.com

CPT RELEASE

Settlers from Harsina Attack Palestinian Home

Paulette Schroeder

16 March 2011

On Monday March 14, fifteen (Israeli) settlers from Harsina Settlement attacked the (Palestinian) Jabber home in Baqa’a Valley.  The Jabber home sits at the bottom of the mountain housing the Harsina Settlement. The Jabber family consists of several families including 17 persons with 12 children.  At 2:30 pm fifteen settlers from Harsina Settlement  began throwing stones at the Jabber home  but were stopped by the Israeli Military.  They returned at 6:30pm and stoned the house for one hour with no interference from the Army.

One of the Jabber brothers who lives across the road from Harsina Settlement  said he was so afraid for his family that he wondered whether he should move his family to one of his cousins’ homes.  He said he does not sleep until 1:30 am or 2:30 am each night.

Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem’s visa revoked



Anglican Bishop
Suheil Dawani

 by Arieh Cohen
Israel considers Anglican Bishop Suheil Dawani a foreigner in Israel, because he was born in Nablus. The Anglican cathedral and offices are in East Jerusalem. Without a visa, in theory he can be arrested and deported at any time.

Jerusalem (AsiaNews) - Israel’s Interior Ministry has revoked the permit for the Anglican Bishop in Jerusalem, The Rt Revd Suheil Dawani, to live in Jerusalem, and has refused requests to reinstate it, in spite of protests by Anglican authorities in the West specifically the United States.

The Bishop is a native of the Holy Land and has spent most of his life and ministry here, but cannot obtain either citizenship or legal residence in Israel, since he was born in Nablus, i.e. in the West Bank, which has been under Israeli occupation since 1967, but has not been annexed to Israel.

East Jerusalem, where the Anglican Cathedral and Diocesan offices are situated, was also occupied at the same time, but Israel annexed it and considers it part of its national territory (although no other country in the world recognizes this annexation). Therefore, Bishop Dawani is considered by Israel to be a foreigner who can only visit East Jerusalem with a special permit, which the Israeli authorities can either grant or deny at their sole discretion.

In fact, all the original Palestinian inhabitants of East Jerusalem, and their descendants, are considered by Israel to be foreigners who are no more than possessors of a residence permit, which Israel can revoke. Since the Bishop has of course remained at his post, in Jerusalem, without the permit, he could be arrested at any moment, be put on trial for being in Israel illegally, be sentenced to a prison term – or simply be forcibly removed from Jerusalem.

For more information check out:

http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/digest/index.cfm/2011/2/26/Anglican-Bishop-of-Jerusalems-visa-revoked

Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz reports German Chancellor getting impatient with Israel

Merkel chides Netanyahu for failing to make 'a single step to advance peace'

In a tense telephone call, PM tells German chancellor that he was disappointed by Germany's vote at UN, but assures her he intends to launch new peace plan soon; Merkel reportedly did not believe Netanyahu, saying he disappointed her.

Merkel and Netanyahu meet in Israel 3 weeks ago.
We now know there was tension in the air

A crisis erupted between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. During a telephone call this week, Merkel told Netanyahu that he had disappointed her and had done nothing to advance peace, sources told Haaretz.

The prime minister tried to persuade Merkel that he was about to launch a diplomatic initiative, explaining he is making a speech in two weeks in which he will outline a new peace plan.

A senior German source said Netanyahu had called Merkel on Monday, following the American veto in the UN Security Council last Friday and Germany's vote in favor of the Palestinian proposal to condemn construction in West Bank settlements.

The conversation between the two leaders was extremely tense and included mutual accusations and harsh statements, the official said.

Netanyahu told Merkel he was disappointed by Germany's vote and by Merkel's refusal to accept Israel's requests before the vote, the source added. Merkel was furious.

"How dare you," she said, according to the official. "You are the one who disappointed us. You haven't made a single step to advance peace."

The prime minister assured Merkel that he intended to launch a new peace plan that would be a continuation of his Bar-Ilan University speech, given in June 2009, in which he agreed to establishing a Palestinian state, the official revealed. "I intend to make a new speech about the peace process in two to three weeks," Netanyahu told Merkel.

The German chancellor and her advisers, who have been repeatedly disappointed by Netanyahu's inaccurate statements and failure to keep promises, did not believe a word of what the prime minister told her, the source said.

Merkel ended her visit in Israel three weeks ago deeply disappointed, a German official said. While here, she told Netanyahu the situation in the Middle East, in view of the revolution in Egypt, made it necessary for Israel to create a peace initiative.

US uses veto at UN to protect illegal Israeli settlements

Washington blocks resolution condemning Israeli settlements in the Palestinian territories as an obstacle to peace.

The US has vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that would have condemned Israeli settlements as "illegal" and called for an immediate halt to all settlement building.

All 14 other Security Council members voted in favour of the resolution, which was backed by the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), on Friday.

Mark Lyall Grant, the British ambassador to the UN, speaking on behalf of the UK, France and Germany, condemned Israeli settlements in the West Bank. "They are illegal under international law," he said.
He added that the European Union's three biggest nations hope that an independent state of Palestine will join the UN as a new member state by September 2011.

The veto by the  administration of Barack Obama, is certain to anger Arab countries and Palestinian supporters around the world. An abstention would have angered the Israelis, the closest ally of Washington in the region, as well as Democratic and Republican supporters of Israel in the US Congress.

The US says it opposes settlements in principal, but says that the UN Security Council is not the appropriate venue for resolving the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the UN, told council members that the veto "should not be misunderstood to mean we support settlement activity".
"While we agree with our fellow council members and indeed with the wider world about the folly and illegitimacy of continued Israeli settlement activity, we think it unwise for this council to attempt to resolve the core issues that divide Israelis and Palestinians," she said.

PA pressured
Earlier, the Obama administration had tried to exert pressure on the Palestinian Authority to drop the UN resolution in exchange for other measures, but this was rejected by the authority. The decision to back the resolution was made unanimously by the PLO's executive and the central committee of Abbas's Fatah movement on Friday, at a meeting to discuss Obama's appeal to Abbas by telephone a day earlier.

"The Palestinian leadership has decided to proceed to the UN Security Council, to pressure Israel to halt settlement activities. The decision was taken despite American pressure," said Wasel Abu Yousef, a PLO executive member. Obama, who had said Israeli settlements in territories it captured in a 1967 war are illegal and unhelpful to the peace process, has argued that the resolution could shatter hopes of reviving the stalled talks. In a 50-minute phone call on Thursday, he asked Abbas to drop the resolution and settle for a non-binding statement condemning settlement expansion, Palestinian officials said.


'Goldstone 2'
"Caving in to American pressure and withdrawing the resolution will constitute Goldstone 2," said a Palestinian official, speaking on terms of anonymity before the meeting. He was referring to the wave of protest in October 2009 accusing Abbas of caving in to US pressure by agreeing not to submit for adoption a UN report that accused Israel and Hamas of war crimes during the invasion of Gaza two years ago.
Abbas maintains he insisted on submitting the report.


'Nothing to lose'
Obama initially pressured Israel to maintain the moratorium only to relent in the run-up to the 2010 US mid-term elections to avoid, some analysts said, alienating key voters. One PLO official said the leadership was determined not to cave in "even if our decision leads to a diplomatic crisis with the Americans", adding: "Now we have nothing to lose."

Since 2000, 14 Security Council resolutions have been vetoed by one or more of the five permanent members - Britain, China, France, Russia and the US. Of those, 10 were US vetoes, nine of them related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.